Re: Re: [GENERAL] 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Lamar Owen
Subject Re: Re: [GENERAL] 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?)
Date
Msg-id 39F9DFD7.ABE486FE@wgcr.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?)  (Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote:
> Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org> writes:
> > Unfortunately RPM deems a dependency upon libpq.so.2.0 to not be
> > fulfilled by libpq.so.2.1 (how _can_ it know?  A client linked to 2.0
> > might fail if 2.1 were to be loaded under it (hypothetically)).

> There usually are no such problems, and I'm not aware of any specific
> to postgresql either.

There have been reports to the pgsql-bugs list and to the PHP list about
this very issue.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alex Pilosov
Date:
Subject: Re: Summary: what to do about INET/CIDR
Next
From: Larry Rosenman
Date:
Subject: (forw) Re: Summary: what to do about INET/CIDR