> > If this should be done differently I'm happy for suggestions...
> I think DEFAULT should probably be represented by a NULL, not by
> a Value node containing a null string pointer.
> I'm willing to do the work if no one else feels strongly about it ;-)
OK. I can't think of a case where we would want to represent multiple
DEFAULT placeholders in the context of SET.
Or if we are going to pick up on the recent proposal to allow
column-specific DEFAULT values perhaps we should use a common
representation for the solution here?
In either case, I won't feel stepped on if you implement the solution,
but I can do so if desired.
- Thomas
