Re: Fw: Fw: bad performance on irix - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Igor Kovalenko
Subject Re: Fw: Fw: bad performance on irix
Date
Msg-id 3C98F230.D2B50A4@motorola.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Fw: Fw: bad performance on irix  ("Robert E. Bruccoleri" <bruc@stone.congenomics.com>)
Responses Re: Fw: Fw: bad performance on irix
List pgsql-hackers
Makes me wonder... perhaps now someone will be convinced to take a look
at the POSIX IPC patch. On some platforms (not on Linux I am afraid)
POSIX mutexes might be quite a bit faster than SYSV semaphores.

Luis Alberto Amigo Navarro wrote:
> 
> Hi all:
> again on performance, here is an extract from an 8 read-only queries, notice
> that total time is 179s and it is expending about 80secs only in semaphores
> Isn't there any other way to improve ipc-locks?
> thanks and regards.
> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
> 
> http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Fixes gram.y
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Notify argument?