Re: autovacuum fringe case? - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Evgeniy Shishkin
Subject Re: autovacuum fringe case?
Date
Msg-id 3EB000F8-7FC6-4693-9451-8A263DBD0452@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to autovacuum fringe case?  (AJ Weber <aweber@comcast.net>)
List pgsql-performance



On 23.01.2013, at 20:53, AJ Weber <aweber@comcast.net> wrote:

> I have a server that is IO-bound right now (it's 4 cores, and top indicates the use rarely hits 25%, but the Wait
spikesabove 25-40% regularly).  The server is running postgresql 9.0 and tomcat 6.  As I have mentioned in a previous
thread,I can't alter the hardware to add disks unfortunately, so I'm going to try and move postgresql off this
applicationserver to its own host, but this is a production environment, so in the meantime... 
>
> Is it possible that some spikes in IO could be attributable to the autovacuum process?  Is there a way to check this
theory?
>

Try iotop

> Would it be advisable (or even permissible to try/test) to disable autovacuum, and schedule a manual vacuumdb in the
middleof the night, when this server is mostly-idle? 
>
> Thanks for any tips.  I'm in a bit of a jam with my limited hardware.
>
> -AJ
>
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: AJ Weber
Date:
Subject: autovacuum fringe case?
Next
From: Jeff Janes
Date:
Subject: Re: autovacuum fringe case?