Re: Setting Shared-Buffers - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Rafael Domiciano
Subject Re: Setting Shared-Buffers
Date
Msg-id 3a0028490907201339l790a0c4fm4520c276b6821e2d@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Setting Shared-Buffers  (Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-admin
Hello People,

I upgraded to a 64 bits System. Now, everything is OK. Thnk you guys.

On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 2:19 AM, Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 10:27 PM, <sriram.dandapani@bt.com> wrote:
>
> 2G per process is plenty ...and useful if you have large data warehouse style queries which are long running (especially multiple of those)

For you, yes.  But not necessarily for others.

> We do benefit from the Linux memory caching model regardless of what Postgres uses right ?

Definitely.

> On a machine which we upgraded from 4G to 16G on a 32 bit PAE kernel...we saw a doubling of performance for most queries of a certain type.(mostly data warehouse type accessing several hundreds of thousands of records).
>
> Postgres version that we use is 8.1.9.

I bet you'd see another big performance improvement with a 64bit OS
and pgsql AND an upgrade to 8.4.  But if it's fast enough, then stick
to 8.1.x  I would recommend an update to the latest 8.1 release
though.

--
Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin

pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: migrating from 8.1.x to 8.2
Next
From: Ibrahim Shaame
Date:
Subject: Re: Cannot create UTF8 database