Re: plpgsql by default - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: plpgsql by default
Date
Msg-id 4009.1144730823@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: plpgsql by default  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: plpgsql by default
Re: plpgsql by default
List pgsql-hackers
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes:
> What does enabling plpgsql do via access that you can't just do from an 
> SQL query?

SQL isn't Turing-complete --- plpgsql is.  So if our would-be hacker has
a need to do some computation incidental to his hack, he can certainly
get it done in plpgsql, but not necessarily in plain SQL.

I don't feel a need to offer specific examples as requested by Andrew.
The point here is that we're offering a significantly more powerful
swiss army knife when we include plpgsql (or any other PL), and it's
hard to foresee the implications of that with any certainty.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
Subject: Re: plpgsql by default
Next
From: David Fetter
Date:
Subject: Re: plpgsql by default