Re: SSL tests fail on OpenSSL v3.2.0 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: SSL tests fail on OpenSSL v3.2.0
Date
Msg-id 4050375.1701135148@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SSL tests fail on OpenSSL v3.2.0  ("Tristan Partin" <tristan@neon.tech>)
Responses Re: SSL tests fail on OpenSSL v3.2.0
List pgsql-hackers
"Tristan Partin" <tristan@neon.tech> writes:
> On Mon Nov 27, 2023 at 7:14 PM CST, Tom Lane wrote:
>> ... If the function
>> does exist in 0.9.8 then I concur that we don't need to test.

> I have gone back all the way to 1.0.0 and confirmed that the function 
> exists. Didn't choose to go further than that since Postgres doesn't 
> support it.

Since this is something we'd need to back-patch, OpenSSL 0.9.8
and later are relevant: the v12 branch still supports those.
It's moot given Bo's claim about the origin of the function,
though.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Tristan Partin"
Date:
Subject: Re: SSL tests fail on OpenSSL v3.2.0
Next
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: Testing autovacuum wraparound (including failsafe)