Re: Log rotation - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Fernando Nasser
Subject Re: Log rotation
Date
Msg-id 40521BE5.5030004@redhat.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Log rotation  (Lamar Owen <lowen@pari.edu>)
Responses Re: Log rotation
List pgsql-hackers
Hi Lamar,

Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Friday 12 March 2004 09:24 am, Fernando Nasser wrote:
> 
>>I don't really care on how its done, but IMO an enterprise class
>>database must be able to do log rotation.  Logging to Syslog is not an
>>option (specially with our verbosity) -- users must be able to use flat
>>files for logging.
> 
> 
> Uh, we have many many many different ways to use syslog.  So my other message 
> on the topic.
> 

Which other message?

Anyway, Syslog is not an option for us.  We need flat files.


> 
>>I never seem some many customer complaints and bug reports about a
>>single item like the ones we have received here about logging.  I think
>>this should be the number 1 item in te TODO list.
> 
> 
> Uh, upgrading?  I'm sure we have more reports about upgrading than logging.
> 

Yeah, but that only comes with a full version upgrade :-)

The logging one keeps popping up as people try and use the server for production.


> But see my reply to bug 103767 for more.

See my reply to your reply ;-)


Best regards,
Fernando




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fernando Nasser
Date:
Subject: Re: Log rotation
Next
From: Bruno Wolff III
Date:
Subject: Re: Log rotation