Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Reduce checkpoints and WAL traffic on low activity database serv - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Reduce checkpoints and WAL traffic on low activity database serv
Date
Msg-id 4092.1320290169@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Reduce checkpoints and WAL traffic on low activity database serv  (Greg Smith <greg@2ndQuadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Greg Smith <greg@2ndQuadrant.com> writes:
> On 11/02/2011 05:48 PM, Simon Riggs wrote:
>> You're missing the point that it never was like that. I've not altered
>> the situation.

> Robert's point is more that the existing docs are already broken; this 
> new patch can just increase how bad the drift between reality and 
> documentation can be.

Yeah.  I agree that we need to adjust the docs.  Anybody object
to Greg's proposed text?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: superusers are members of all roles?
Next
From: kris@shannon.id.au
Date:
Subject: Re: Is there a good reason we don't have INTERVAL 'infinity'?