Re: virtual fields on VIEW? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Richard Huxton
Subject Re: virtual fields on VIEW?
Date
Msg-id 40D7385B.10502@archonet.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: virtual fields on VIEW?  (raptor <raptor@tvskat.net>)
Responses Re: virtual fields on VIEW?
Re: virtual fields on VIEW?
List pgsql-general
raptor wrote:
>
> ]- re: to myself... In fact I was using postgres in the past afaik
> 6.x versions or so (no outer joins, rule system was still not fully
> working ... it was good on paper was good but, ... now glad it has
> advanced so much :")).. then i got using Inter Base(FireBird).
> (really cool db :") ) From what I see 7.x series has made huge step
> forward.. probably now surpacing firebird on features side.. (they
> had hard time adapting Interbase code) (no flame pls!)

Firebird is the only viable open-source alternative to PG that I can
think of (which has been a viable project for any length of time).

> AFAIK firebird(interbase) and postgres are the only DB with
> multiversioning engines, is that true ?

I think Oracle has its version.

--
   Richard Huxton
   Archonet Ltd

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Richard Huxton
Date:
Subject: Re: New to the list; would this be an okay question?
Next
From: Martijn van Oosterhout
Date:
Subject: Re: New to the list; would this be an okay question?