Re: subtransaction assert failure - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Subject | Re: subtransaction assert failure |
Date | |
Msg-id | 41497D84.6010009@dunslane.net Whole thread Raw |
In response to | subtransaction assert failure (Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>) |
Responses |
Re: subtransaction assert failure
|
List | pgsql-hackers |
I am also seeing regular "make check" failures on my test buildfarm system (FC1, 2.4.22 kernel, cassert turned on): sysname | snapshot | status | stage--------+---------------------+--------+-------cat | 2004-09-15 15:25:59| 2 | Checkcat | 2004-09-15 23:27:37 | 0 | OKcat | 2004-09-16 00:25:55 | 2 | Check cheers andrew Neil Conway wrote: > I'm seeing an intermittent assertion failure while running "make > check" with current sources. I can usually reproduce the problem at > least once out of every 3 or 4 runs of "make check" on each of two > different machines (one is an 866 mhz iBook running OSX, the other is > a dual Xeon @ 2.8 ghz running Debian w/ kernel 2.6). The assertion > failure is: > > TRAP: FailedAssertion("!(TransactionIdFollowsOrEquals(xid, > RecentXmin))", File: > "/Users/neilc/pgsql/src/backend/access/transam/subtrans.c", Line: 146) > > The backtrace is: > > #0 0x900429ac in kill () > #1 0x9009eb1c in abort () > #2 0x001c3b60 in ExceptionalCondition (conditionName=0x0, > errorType=0x25 "", fileName=0x95 "", lineNumber=1768842554) at > /Users/neilc/pgsql/src/backend/utils/error/assert.c:51 > #3 0x000461c8 in SubTransGetTopmostTransaction (xid=6145) at > /Users/neilc/pgsql/src/backend/access/transam/subtrans.c:146 > #4 0x001e266c in HeapTupleSatisfiesSnapshot (tuple=0x1801, > snapshot=0x1801) at /Users/neilc/pgsql/src/backend/utils/time/tqual.c:798 > #5 0x00016330 in heap_release_fetch (relation=0xae2a40, > snapshot=0x203ec1c, tuple=0x2048f6c, userbuf=0x2048f84, keep_buf=1 > '\001', pgstat_info=0x2048fa8) at > /Users/neilc/pgsql/src/backend/access/heap/heapam.c:973 > #6 0x0001efa4 in index_getnext (scan=0x1, direction=11414080) at > /Users/neilc/pgsql/src/backend/access/index/indexam.c:524 > #7 0x000cd420 in IndexNext (node=0x27615c) at > /Users/neilc/pgsql/src/backend/executor/nodeIndexscan.c:316 > #8 0x000c6f5c in ExecScan (node=0x20489d8, accessMtd=0xcd114 > <IndexNext>) at /Users/neilc/pgsql/src/backend/executor/execScan.c:98 > #9 0x000c1c4c in ExecProcNode (node=0x20489d8) at > /Users/neilc/pgsql/src/backend/executor/execProcnode.c:307 > #10 0x000ceac8 in ExecMergeJoin (node=0x20489d8) at > /Users/neilc/pgsql/src/backend/executor/nodeMergejoin.c:754 > #11 0x000c1c88 in ExecProcNode (node=0x2048680) at > /Users/neilc/pgsql/src/backend/executor/execProcnode.c:330 > #12 0x000cabe8 in agg_retrieve_direct (aggstate=0x2048388) at > /Users/neilc/pgsql/src/backend/executor/nodeAgg.c:762 > #13 0x000c1cc4 in ExecProcNode (node=0x2048388) at > /Users/neilc/pgsql/src/backend/executor/execProcnode.c:353 > #14 0x000d0b84 in ExecSort (node=0x20482fc) at > /Users/neilc/pgsql/src/backend/executor/nodeSort.c:102 > #15 0x000c1cac in ExecProcNode (node=0x20482fc) at > /Users/neilc/pgsql/src/backend/executor/execProcnode.c:345 > #16 0x000c0294 in ExecutePlan (estate=0x204801c, planstate=0x20482fc, > operation=CMD_SELECT, numberTuples=0, direction=1768842554, > dest=0xaf2684) at /Users/neilc/pgsql/src/backend/executor/execMain.c:1060 > #17 0x000bf4ac in ExecutorRun (queryDesc=0x203ec48, > direction=33849372, count=0) at > /Users/neilc/pgsql/src/backend/executor/execMain.c:226 > #18 0x001521f8 in PortalRunSelect (portal=0x201f5c8, forward=-4 '?', > count=33811528, dest=0x0) at > /Users/neilc/pgsql/src/backend/tcop/pquery.c:718 > [...] > > (captured from the OSX machine; note that certain parts of the > backtrace seem corrupted, so I wouldn't put _too_ much faith in it.) > > I can consistently repro this, provided I have the patience to run > "make check" enough times. Can anyone else repro the problem? > > -Neil > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings >
pgsql-hackers by date: