Andrew McMillan wrote:
> Switching to Arch is more work, but it also offers a lot more benefits -
> including the opportunity for individuals to maintain their own trees,
> and be able to work out which patchsets from someone else's tree have
> not been applied. If anything is going to become the open-source
> BitKeeper it will be this, I think.
>
For those interested in SVN versus arch, I found the following from Tom
Lord (the guy behind Arch)
http://web.mit.edu/ghudson/thoughts/diagnosing
and a reply from Greg Hudson (SVN developer)
http://web.mit.edu/ghudson/thoughts/undiagnosing.
Regards,
Thomas Hallgren
