Re: Vote on Omar Design - Mailing list pgsql-www
From | Alexey Borzov |
---|---|
Subject | Re: Vote on Omar Design |
Date | |
Msg-id | 419FBF78.70303@cs.msu.su Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: Vote on Omar Design (Omar Kilani <omar@tinysofa.org>) |
Responses |
Re: Vote on Omar Design
|
List | pgsql-www |
Hi, First of all: that's the kind of attitude we value here. I'm sure that you'll feel at home in our web team. ; Omar Kilani wrote: >> Sorry if it offends you, but your name is not quite English-sounding >> to me. > > Neither is yours. Yet I never presumed anything about your level of > English competency. > > It's a global world and you're on the Internet. People with non-English > sounding names are everywhere, and a lot of them speak and write better > English than those with English sounding names. Please be mindful of > this fact before making assumptions about people. Judging by the quality of this rant, you *are* the native English speaker and are perfectly able to write content for postgresql.org. Glad to know. > Since the side navigation persists across every category, and the top > element is always the root of the category, it didn't/doesn't seem > necessary. Usability stuff, you know. > Variable versus fixed width shouldn't hold up progress. Yes, it's > possible to make it variable width, and yes, I understand the geek > factor of variable width: scalability, flexibility, etc. But it does not > take into account usability or aesthetics, which are much more > important. If variable width is a requirement, then the requirement is > flawed. I fail to see how fixed-width adds to usability while variable-width reduces it. > Everything has pros and cons. When taking our design into account, I > believe the pros far outweigh the cons. That makes it a winner to me. That's your design so you cannot be objective, obviously. >> As for RedHat... well... the more I look at that the more I see some >> uncanny *similarities* with your design. Care to comment? > > Look at mozilla.org, macromedia.com, apple.com, redhat.com, nikon.com, > wacom.com, ford.com, benq.com, fiat.com, blogger.com, gmail.com, > oxygen.com, nbc.com etc. Right now I'm looking at redhat.com and see the *same* three-links-and-a-search-box thingy on the topmost part of the page and the *same* grey-menu-with-rounded-edges-and-white-letters as on http://postgresql.tinysofa.com/ >> P.S. I had some questions [1] concerning your language-handling patch > > 1) Didn't see it in .htaccess. Revert if you like. Though I haven't seen > anyone not have it in their code. Oh, I didn't realise that so many sites actually use this. It is considered Bad practice in Russian-language part of the internet: there are several charsets for Russian, the page may be recoded and it is quite possible that charset embedded in page's HTML will not match actual charset. > 3) It handles them by ignoring them: > > + $accepts_lang = explode(';', $accepts_lang); > + $accepts_lang = $accepts_lang[0]; > > Since they're already sorted, and you want the first valid language. > Again, revert if you like. Or add support for q. OK, I'll add support for it later.