Re: Very important choice - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Richard Huxton
Subject Re: Very important choice
Date
Msg-id 41FF42EE.1060501@archonet.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Very important choice  ("Lago, Bruno Almeida do" <extern.Bruno.Lago@gedas.com.br>)
List pgsql-performance
Lago, Bruno Almeida do wrote:
> Hello my friends,
>
> I'd like to know (based on your experience and technical details) which OS
> is recommended for running PostgreSQL keeping in mind 3 indicators:
>
> 1 - Performance (SO, Network and IO)
> 2 - SO Stability
> 3 - File System Integrity

The short answer is almost certainly whichever OS you are most familiar
with. If you have a problem, you don't want to be learning new details
about your OS while fixing it. That rules out FreeBSD for now.

What hardware you want to use will affect performance and choice of OS.
You'll need to decide what hardware you're looking to use.

As far as file-systems are concerned, ext3 seems to be the slowest, and
the general feeling seems to be that XFS is perhaps the fastest. In
terms of reliability, avoid cutting-edge releases of any file-system -
let others test them for you. One thing to consider is how long it takes
to recover from a crash - you can run PostgreSQL on ext2, but checking a
large disk can take hours after a crash. That's the real benefit of
journalling for PG - speed of recovery.

--
   Richard Huxton
   Archonet Ltd

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Cosimo Streppone
Date:
Subject: Re: High end server and storage for a PostgreSQL OLTP system
Next
From: PFC
Date:
Subject: Re: [SQL] OFFSET impact on Performance???