Re: Remove "Source Code" column from \df+ ? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Remove "Source Code" column from \df+ ?
Date
Msg-id 41a333df-992f-8af0-da33-d26c28a0c877@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Remove "Source Code" column from \df+ ?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Remove "Source Code" column from \df+ ?
Re: Remove "Source Code" column from \df+ ?
List pgsql-hackers
On 10/12/16 11:16 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> I'm not sure that Peter was voting for retaining "internal name", but
> personally I prefer that to deleting prosrc entirely, so +1.

I'm not sure what the point of showing the internal name would be if we
have already declared that the source code of non-C functions is not
that interesting.  But I don't have a strong feeling about it.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Vitaly Burovoy
Date:
Subject: Re: macaddr 64 bit (EUI-64) datatype support
Next
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: Remove "Source Code" column from \df+ ?