FAQ or so? - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy
From | Jean-Christophe Arnu |
---|---|
Subject | FAQ or so? |
Date | |
Msg-id | 421C3F92.5020708@tuxfarm.org Whole thread Raw |
Responses |
Re: FAQ or so?
Re: FAQ or so? |
List | pgsql-advocacy |
Hi folks, maybe is this a so long debated subject.. But maybe is it a good starting point to refresh all the demonstrations points of PostgreSQL advocacy or PostgreSQL-vs-xx arguments. It may be usefull for me (and I believe other people here) to be able to argue on various points just like the eternal « what about the responsabilities issues ? » or « who will be responsible for xxx ? » (that's my discussion today, but it can be another-day/thread for other points). While discussing with other IT-people in different country (US, CA, FR), the responsability issue is always put on the top of the problems of IT-directors each time you talk about PostgreSQL migration. This kind of problem is now more sensible than in the past because, from my point of view, there is lesser technical problem to migrate to PG now (I mean there's plenty of (very good) technical reasons to migrate from an another proprietary/opensource database management system). The problem is more on the policy side (or «politics» as we use to say in France), and I would like to have some others arguments than, just contact a service co. to get some support/responsibility for PostgreSQL. Any answer I get back from this arguments is that there's _no_ real editor to put the blame (i.e. get money back) on. I'm not quite experienced on this field, but I heard a lot of people here in France saying that End User License tells users that the editor is not responsible of malfunctions or deasaster liable to the software they are using. I can argue this, but people still believe that accepting such licences give them the ability to lead the editor to the court. More generaly, this is an OpenSource question. But PostgreSQL case is more sensible from my point of view because, large scale migration is about to be done in France (on the country administration side btw) and no direction or no project manager wants to handle (or endorse) the responsability of PostgreSQL migration or choice (whereas they could handle it technically). My question is, how can I refine my arguments, do you have others arguments I can use? What could we say about responsabilities issue regarding to PG? How can I better advocate on PG -more generally- ? I hope it won't be an off topic discussion (well, I would'nt post this message to -hackers ;) ). Moreover, please "pardon my French". Thanks a lot for any answer :) -- Jean-Christophe
pgsql-advocacy by date: