Re: Extremely Slow Cascade Delete Operation - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Yan Cheng Cheok
Subject Re: Extremely Slow Cascade Delete Operation
Date
Msg-id 422045.90987.qm@web65707.mail.ac4.yahoo.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Extremely Slow Cascade Delete Operation  (Craig Ringer <craig@postnewspapers.com.au>)
List pgsql-general
OMG, I never know what is index (Sorry for my newbies) I will study about them and update you all about their
performance.

Thanks and Regards
Yan Cheng CHEOK


--- On Wed, 1/13/10, Craig Ringer <craig@postnewspapers.com.au> wrote:

> From: Craig Ringer <craig@postnewspapers.com.au>
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Extremely Slow Cascade Delete Operation
> To: "Yan Cheng Cheok" <yccheok@yahoo.com>
> Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
> Date: Wednesday, January 13, 2010, 7:01 PM
> On 13/01/2010 4:09 PM, Yan Cheng
> Cheok wrote:
> > I have 3 tables - lot, unit and measurement
> >
> > 1 lot is having relationship to many unit.
> > 1 unit is having relationship to many measurement.
> > delete cascade is being used among their relationship
> >
>
> > SemiconductorInspection=# delete from lot where lot_id
> = 2;
>
> Are there indexes on fk_lot_id and fk_unit_id ? If not, a
> DELETE from lot will cause a seqscan of unit for affected
> units, and if any must be deleted each will cause a seqscan
> of measurement for affected measurements. That's going to
> get ugly fast.
>
> --
> Craig Ringer
>
> -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>





pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: postgresql 8.1 windows 2008 64 bit
Next
From: Adrian Klaver
Date:
Subject: Re: R: Re: R: Re: Weird EXECUTE ... USING behaviour