Tom Lane wrote:
>"Andrew Dunstan" <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>
>
>>I'm not quite sure what question I should be asking of the Cygwin people.
>>Tom, Can you suggest something?
>>
>>
>
>It sounds to me like the problem is that the backend executing the test
>script is in a tight loop (due to the half-baked implementation of sleep())
>and for some reason this prevents the stats processes from running ---
>for a far longer period than it by rights ought to. Ask about recent
>changes in process scheduling policy. (I suppose that actually it's
>Windows doing the scheduling, but what we want to know about is cygwin
>changes that might have affected Windows scheduling parameters.)
>
>
The only answer so far received says:
Sounds to me like yet another case of
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2005-03/msg00730.html
cheers
andrew
