Re: pg_get_prepared? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Christopher Kings-Lynne
Subject Re: pg_get_prepared?
Date
Msg-id 42D8A084.1030700@familyhealth.com.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_get_prepared?  ("Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg@turnstep.com>)
Responses Re: pg_get_prepared?
List pgsql-hackers
> This has been covered before, but to reiterate: why would you need this?
> Any application worth its salt should be tracking which statements it
> has already prepared (after all, they cannot span connections). Seems
> a waste of resources to make a separate call to the database for
> information you should already know.

Erm, websites...use persistent connections...you have no idea if you're 
dealing with a new connection or a reused one, and if the statement is 
prepared or not.

Chris


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kris Jurka
Date:
Subject: Re: 4 pgcrypto regressions failures - 1 unsolved
Next
From: Kevin Brown
Date:
Subject: Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC