Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Dave Page wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman@candle.pha.pa.us]
>>>Sent: 23 July 2005 20:01
>>>To: Dave Page
>>>Cc: PostgreSQL-development
>>>Subject: Re: [HACKERS] For review: Server instrumentation patch
>>>
>>>
>>>This patch looks good. The only question I have is why you
>>>didn't want
>>>the pgport rename/unlink calls?
Because I wanted the standard platform behaviour of both. For backend
storage subsystem purposes, it's certainly necessary to emulate *ix
behaviour of deleting a file in use, but for generic file access IMHO
the generic behaviour should be exposed.
Please note that there's some rollback logic in pg_file_rename that
might break when using the pg_xxx calls.
Regards,
Andreas
