Re: Thoughs after discussions at OSCON - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Ned Lilly
Subject Re: Thoughs after discussions at OSCON
Date
Msg-id 42FFD90B.6080800@nedscape.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Thoughs after discussions at OSCON  (Chris Travers <chris@travelamericas.com>)
List pgsql-advocacy
Chris Travers wrote:

> Personally I have never bought the "Put as much logic into your database
> as possible."  This can *easily* be taken way too far.  Review the
> discussions on pgsql-general about why sending email from the database
> backend is a bad idea.  Can you write a CRM application server in
> PLPGSQL?  Sure.  But I am not sure it is a good idea.....

We've got a very powerful ERP system that has most of its transactional business logic in pl/pgsql, so I'll
respectfullydisagree with you here ;-)  We think it makes a powerful showcase for what PostgreSQL can do with even
commodity-levelserver hardware. 

Cheers,
Ned

--
Ned Lilly
President and CEO
OpenMFG, LLC
119 West York Street
Norfolk, VA 23510
tel. 757.461.3022
email: ned@openmfg.com
www.openmfg.com

pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Chris Travers
Date:
Subject: Re: Thoughs after discussions at OSCON
Next
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: An Open Letter from EnterpriseDB