Re: PostgreSQL 8.1 vs. MySQL 5.0? - Mailing list pgsql-general
From | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Subject | Re: PostgreSQL 8.1 vs. MySQL 5.0? |
Date | |
Msg-id | 43510C59.5070702@commandprompt.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: PostgreSQL 8.1 vs. MySQL 5.0? (Johan Wehtje <joweht@tpgi.com.au>) |
Responses |
Re: PostgreSQL 8.1 vs. MySQL 5.0? > Access-like Query builder > C++ Vector-based GUI binding
|
List | pgsql-general |
Johan Wehtje wrote: > I doubt you read the rest of the post otherwise I don't think you > would make that comment. Personlly I think you were right. Access is a good front end, at least in the sense that it is a hell of a lot better than anything the OSS community has bothered to come up with. I actually Paradox is a better choice :). It is also a front-end that customers are comfortable with. > > I think there really is a need for a rich DB client that allows Rapid > development and is easy to link to an office Suite. To be useful to a > business a database needs the applications built on top of it, and > like I said if someone can show me a quicker way of doing this than > Access and still lets me use Postgresql for my backend without any > great drama, I would love to hear of it. My experience with Access > 2000 and the latest ODBC drivers has been very positive, but I am wary > of Microsoft's intentions for Access going forward, which I why I > asked if anyone knew of a really viable alternative that I have not > tried. FYI Open Office 2.0 database, forms, reports etc... is MUCH better than it was. I believe you can script it as well in Python and maybe Java. > > The next best thing that I have tried is Delphi with some of the > libraries available from Sqlmanager or Active Query builder. You can use Kylix for that but I don't know its status. > > But really, for most of the situations I encounter this is a bit like > re-inventing the wheel every time someone wants a cart built. You end > up trying to build an Access like application from the ground up every > time someone wants a Db app. And that seems to me to be taking > antipathy towards Microsoft to a point where it benefits no-one. > > Cheers > Johan Wehtje > > Matthew Peter wrote: > >> Someone trying to stick microsoft yet another place >> they don't belong. >> >> --- Johan Wehtje <joweht@tpgi.com.au> wrote: >> >>> Very much a description of the Business I am in. >>> >>> For all the criticism leveled at it, I still think >>> that as a rich Database Client that permits really rapid >>> development of Database driven applications Access is unbeatable. >>> Pair it with a >>> good Database server and it is the perfect combination. >> >> >> >> >> __________________________________ Yahoo! Music Unlimited Access over >> 1 million songs. Try it free. >> http://music.yahoo.com/unlimited/ >> >> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- >> TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? >> >> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq >> >> . >> > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster -- Your PostgreSQL solutions company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.800.492.2240 PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Programming, 24x7 support Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/
pgsql-general by date: