>
> Hm, so if this patch is applied now, and in 5 months or so somebody
> implements pg_upgrade, this numeric storage patch would be rolled back?
> OTOH, an upgrade mechanism that's compatible for future 8.3+ versions
> only seems not too attractive.
With Slony and Replicator I don't really see the need for in place
upgrades.
Joshua D. Drake
> A solution might be to keep the current numeric implementation under a
> different name (deprecatednumeric or so), for backward compatibility
> (this should apply to future storage format changes as well).
>
> Regards,
> Andreas
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
> choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
> match
