Re: Search machine is ready - Mailing list pgsql-www
From | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Subject | Re: Search machine is ready |
Date | |
Msg-id | 43F24DD2.20203@commandprompt.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Search machine is ready ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Responses |
Re: Search machine is ready
|
List | pgsql-www |
Dave Page wrote: > I am forwarding this to pgsql-www as it really is a community decision. > > On 14/2/06 18:00, "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote: > >>> To setup user accounts, to install/upgrade PostgreSQL/Aspseek/apache, to >> Well you shouldn't need root access for any of that. Nor should you be >> upgrading anything but Aspseek. If we need something upgrading we will >> gladly handle it. >> >>> fix things when they go wrong... We will continue to run and manage >>> things on a day to day basis, just with Command Prompt as backup. >>> >>> >>> I thought this was a dedicated machine? >> It is a dedicated machine. We don't allow root access to anyone on any >> of the machines we host, regardless if it is dedicated. >> >> This way we don't get weird things like people not knowing "who" >> installed an alpha version of mailman (like on pgFoundry). >> >> Our experience shows that if you think you need root access, chances >> are you don't. From your above requirements, you don't need root access. >> >> You do need some group perms setup, sudo ability to a couple of >> administrative commands. >> >> I know this is a little different then how the community is used to >> working but we have a solid track record and this is one of the reasons. > > Hi Joshua, > > You are right that what you are proposing is not the way we are used to > working, and having consulted with the other admins in the community > (specifically Marc and Magnus), we agree that we do not want to change the > way we work and have to rely on people that we don't know, and have no > intimate knowledge of our requirements or systems in a time when we might > need almost instant response in the middle of the night. > > We would be prepared to compromise and be restricted to root control of a VM > if you're prepared to setup the box as a Linux Vserver however. That would > ensure that only your staff have control over the host OS, allowing them to > support the system and network etc, but give us the control we require over > the software we run. > > Regards, Dave Well John Hansen didn't have a problem with it and has already begun work. I have also already stated that we can make sure that you actually have access to what you "need" to operate the environment. Your requirements as listed above distinctly note a lack of a need for root access. Thus I really don't know what your concern is outside of a feeling that you need "control". Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake -- The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.503.667.4564 PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/