Re: Pgfoundry and gborg: shut one down - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Hallgren
Subject Re: Pgfoundry and gborg: shut one down
Date
Msg-id 43F85870.4000802@tada.se
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Pgfoundry and gborg: shut one down  ("Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>)
List pgsql-hackers
Dave Page wrote:
> 
> Moving CVS is not a problem - each project has their own repo on both systems. The problem is moving all the database
stuffsuch as the bug trackers and todo lists, for which I'm told there are no working scripts.
 
> 
> The other one that caused me great pain when I moved psqlODBC over was the GBorg genpages. I ended up manually
pullingthe code out of them and into plain HTML files as there is no equivalent area on pgFoundry.
 
> 
> FWIW, in both the moves I have done (psqlODBC and Npgsql), only the CVS was actually moved.
>
Perhaps that's the general solution. Forget about the database, genpages etc. and ask 
respective project administrators to move them manually? The two really important things are 
the CVS and the mailing-list.

On my part, It'd be sufficient if those two where moved. My html content stems from my CVS 
and I plan to restructure it a bit anyway. My bug-tracking can be moved manually if need be.

I too would be happy if I could somehow migrate to SVN but that can be done later.

Regards,
Thomas Hallgren



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Jim C. Nasby"
Date:
Subject: Re: Generating config stuff from single source
Next
From: Martijn van Oosterhout
Date:
Subject: Re: Domains and supporting functions