Re: Query time - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Ruben Rubio Rey
Subject Re: Query time
Date
Msg-id 44115521.1040805@rentalia.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Query time  (Ruben Rubio Rey <ruben@rentalia.com>)
Responses Re: Query time
List pgsql-performance
There is not possibility to use another database. It's the best option I
have seen. We have been working in postgres in last 3 years, and this is
the first problem I have seen. (The database is working in a large
website, 6.000 visits per day in a dedicated server)

Any other idea?


Chethana, Rao (IE10) wrote:

>USUALLY POSTGRES DATABASE TAKES MORE TIME, COMPARED TO OTHER DATABASES.
>HOWEVER U CAN FINETUNE THE PERFORMANCE OF POSTGRESQL.
>IF U HAVE AN OPTION GO FOR SQLITE, MYSQL OR FIREBIRD.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org
>[mailto:pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Ruben Rubio
>Rey
>Sent: Friday, March 10, 2006 2:06 AM
>To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
>Subject: [PERFORM] Query time
>
>Hi,
>
>I think im specting problems with a 7.4.8 postgres database.
>
>Sometimes some big query takes between 5 to 15 seconds. It happens
>sometimes all the day it does not depend if database is busy.
>
>I have measured that sentence in 15 - 70 ms in normal circunstances.
>
>Why sometimes its takes too much time?
>How can I fix it?
>Is a postgres version problem, database problem or query problem?
>
>Any ideas will be apreciatted.
>
>Ruben Rubio
>
>
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
>
>
>
>


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Richard Huxton
Date:
Subject: Re: Process Time X200
Next
From: "NbForYou"
Date:
Subject: Re: Process Time X200