Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs
Date
Msg-id 444E8DD8.3040504@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs  (David Boreham <david_list@boreham.org>)
Responses Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs
List pgsql-performance
David Boreham wrote:
>
>> Actually, that was from an article from this last month that compared
>> the dual core intel to the amd.  for every dollar spent on the intel,
>> you got about half the performance of the amd.  Not bigotry.  fact.
>>
>> But don't believe me or the other people who've seen the difference.  Go
>> buy the Intel box.  No skin off my back.
>>
> I've been doing plenty of performance evaluation on a parallel application
> we're developing here : on Dual Core Opterons, P4, P4D. I can say that
> the Opterons open up a can of wupass on the Intel processors. Almost 2x
> the performance on our application vs. what the SpecCPU numbers would
> suggest.

Because Stone Cold Said So!

>
>


--

            === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
      Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
      Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
                     http://www.commandprompt.com/



pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: David Boreham
Date:
Subject: Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs