> It really isn't neccessary. That said, there is *something* going on with your
> db, so it might be prudent to figure out what it is.
>
Thanks, Robert. Actually, I noted that each time I ran my backup
script, the OID mentioned in the error was bigger than previous number.
Before I run the reindexdb program, I am running the vacuumlo (from
contrib). Just by putting a sleep 5 between the two commands, I cannot
reproduce the error. If I remove the sleep, then the error happens
again. Clearly, there's something "left over" from vacuumlo that
reindexdb is finding.
Any thoughts on that observation?
Thanks,
David
