Re: Solaris shared_buffers anomaly? - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: Solaris shared_buffers anomaly?
Date
Msg-id 448F4264.5030109@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Solaris shared_buffers anomaly?  (Mischa Sandberg <mischa@ca.sophos.com>)
List pgsql-performance
> Initially shared_buffers were set to 1000 (8MB).
> Then, we moved all apps but the database server off the box.
>
> Raised shared_buffers to 2000 (16MB).
> Modest improvement in some frequent repeated queries.
>
> Raised shared_buffers to 16000 (128MB).
> DB server dropped to a CRAWL.

Versions below 8.1 normally don't do well with high shared_buffers. 8.1
would do much better. If you dropped that to more like 6k you would
probably continue to see increase over 2k.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake


--

    === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
    Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
              http://www.commandprompt.com/



pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "Jim C. Nasby"
Date:
Subject: Re: Confirmation of bad query plan generated by 7.4
Next
From: Mischa Sandberg
Date:
Subject: Re: Solaris shared_buffers anomaly?