Bort, Paul wrote:
> Given the concerns about running this on machines that don't have a lot
> of CPU and disk to spare, should it ship disabled?
>
Yes, certainly.
> Andrew, what do you think of pgbench reports shipping separately? I have
> no idea how the server end is set up, so I don't know how much of a pain
> that would be.
>
>
>
Well, we'll need to put in some changes to collect the data, certainly.
I don't see why we shouldn't ship the pgbench result separately, but ...
> P.S. My current thought for settings is scaling factor 10, users 5,
> transactions 1000.
>
>
... at this size it's hardly worth it. A quick test on my laptop showed
this taking about a minute for the setup and another minute for the run,
Unless we scale way beyond this I don't see any point in separate reporting.
cheers
andrew
