Re: Opteron vs. Xeon "benchmark" - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Arjen van der Meijden
Subject Re: Opteron vs. Xeon "benchmark"
Date
Msg-id 4513A5EF.7000201@tweakers.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Opteron vs. Xeon "benchmark"  (Hannes Dorbath <light@theendofthetunnel.de>)
List pgsql-performance
Try the translation ;)

http://tweakers.net/reviews/646/13

On 22-9-2006 10:32 Hannes Dorbath wrote:
> A colleague pointed me to this site tomorrow:
>
> http://tweakers.net/reviews/642/13
>
> I can't read the language, so can't get a grip on what exactly the
> "benchmark" was about.
>
> Their diagrams show `Request per seconds'. What should that mean? How
> many connections PG accepted per second? So they measured the OS fork
> performance? Should that value be of any interrest? Anyone with heavy
> OLTP workload will use persistent connections or a connection pool in
> front.
>
> Do they mean TPS? That woulnd't make much sense in a CPU benchmark, as
> OLTP workload is typically limited by the disc subsystem.
>
> Can someone enlighten me what this site is about?
>
>

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Hannes Dorbath
Date:
Subject: Opteron vs. Xeon "benchmark"
Next
From: Markus Schaber
Date:
Subject: Re: Large tables (was: RAID 0 not as fast as