Re: [PATCHES] Generic Monitoring Framework with DTrace patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Lor
Subject Re: [PATCHES] Generic Monitoring Framework with DTrace patch
Date
Msg-id 452B7EF9.5070500@sun.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCHES] Generic Monitoring Framework with DTrace patch  (Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Sorry for the delayed response.

Robert Treat wrote:

>Looking through -patches I don't see the doc patch, and outside of 
>installation.sgml there doesn't seem to be anything either. Robert, are you 
>still on the hook for these?  
>
Josh will help submit the doc patch. I have documented the usage 
instructions in a couple of places but just have been too busy to get 
the patch submitted. My bad.

http://pgfoundry.org/docman/?group_id=1000163
http://blogs.sun.com/robertlor

>Also should installation.sgml mention the 
>issues with building 32 vs 64 bit binaries and/or the issue with static 
>functions? 
>  
>
There are no issues with building 32 and 64 bit binaries. The above doc 
explains the issue with static function.

Regards,
-Robert



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Magnus Hagander"
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] test: please ignore
Next
From: Robert Lor
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Generic Monitoring Framework with DTrace patch