Duncan Garland wrote:
> I do appreciate your replies, they made interesting reading. You all clearly
> believe in your product. However, it is a bit worrying that nobody on the
> Postgres advocacy mailing list could point me towards any authoratative
> material advocating Postgres over MySQL.
May not be overly authoritative but - performance wise there are
benchmarks at tweakers.net - these are hardware performance testing that
use mysql and postgresql to measure what the hardware can do compared to
other hardware.
http://tweakers.net/reviews/646/10
I think a lot of comparisons/advocacy have basically been "I prefer x
because..." with some doing internal performance testing when first
making their choice.
I don't know of any that would compare db's feature to feature like you
might see in a pc mag comparing MS SQL with Oracle.
--
Shane Ambler
pgSQL@007Marketing.com
Get Sheeky @ http://Sheeky.Biz
