Uwe C. Schroeder wrote:
> why don't you just use < '00:00:00'::time
> and avoid the issue?
>
> IMHO there shouldn't even be a 24:00:00, because that would imply that there
> is a 24:00:01 - which there is not.
> It should go from 23:59 to 00:00
> But then, I didn't write the spec for time in general, so maybe there is a
> 24:00 which is identical to 00:00
Ah, times and dates are wonderful things though. For example, '23:59:60'
is a valid time (and not equal to 24:00:00 or 00:00:00) every so often.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leap_second
--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd
