On 18 Nov 2006 at 13:09, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
> > > O.k. and is OpenSPF the definitive source for information on it?
> >
> > I do not know who is the definite source.
> >
> > > Honestly, the whole thing sounds pretty pointless at least at this
> > > juncture. I am not bashing the technology but I don't really see a
> > > reason for it.
> >
> > Good! Then you'd agree, there's no harm in publishing our SPF
> > records vis DNS and letting others use it.
>
> My only argument would be *if* there is additional administrative
> overhead. If not.. I a really don't care :). If Marc wants to use it,
> have at it.
It is a DNS record. It only requires updating if you substantially
change your existing MX strategy.
--
Dan Langille : Software Developer looking for work
my resume: http://www.freebsddiary.org/dan_langille.php
