Pavan Deolasee wrote:
> One assumption I am making here is that its sufficient to mark the line
> pointer
> "unused" (reset LP_USED flag) even though there is an index entry pointing
> to
> the tuple. During index scan, we anyways check for ItemIdIsUsed() before
> proceeding further. I know it might break the ctid chain, but does that
> really
> matter ? I don't see any reason why somebody would need to follow ctid
> chain
> past a dead tuple.
You can't clear the LP_USED flag, but you could use the LP_DELETE flag
that's currently not used in heap pages.
-- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
