Re: Problem with Bitmap Heap Scan - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Rushabh Lathia
Subject Re: Problem with Bitmap Heap Scan
Date
Msg-id 460abcb10811190308n3dd06e4ei957d57a34746cbbe@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Problem with Bitmap Heap Scan  ("Rushabh Lathia" <rushabh.lathia@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers

Analysis:
========

While debugging bitmap heap scan (BitmapHeapNext function) found that first we perform the underlying index scan and then iterate over bitmap. Now while iterating,  we execute ExecQual only if tbmres->recheck is true. And for the query tbmres->recheck is false.

But from the query it seems that we should execute ExecQual as we having "bitmpaqual" on the BitmapHeap node (Not quite sure). And when I manually did recheck = ture, query working fine and as expected.


Regards.
Rushabh
www.EnterpriseDB.com

On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 4:26 PM, Rushabh Lathia <rushabh.lathia@gmail.com> wrote:
Simple select give wrong result when it uses the Bitmap Heap Scan path.


postgres=# CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION my_exec_im_test_func(i integer) RETURNS integer AS $$       
        BEGIN               
                RETURN i + 1;
        END;
$$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;
CREATE FUNCTION

postgres=# set enable_seqscan=off;
SET
postgres=# set enable_indexscan=off;
SET
postgres=# select proname from pg_proc where proname like 'my_pro1';
       proname       
----------------------
 my_exec_im_test_proc
(1 row)

postgres=# explain select proname from pg_proc where proname like 'my_pro1';
                                         QUERY PLAN                            
            
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------
 Bitmap Heap Scan on pg_proc  (cost=4.26..8.27 rows=1 width=64)
   Recheck Cond: (proname ~~ 'my_pro1'::text)
   ->  Bitmap Index Scan on pg_proc_proname_args_nsp_index  (cost=0.00..4.26 row
s=1 width=0)
         Index Cond: ((proname >= 'my'::name) AND (proname < 'mz'::name))
(4 rows)




--
Rushabh Lathia

www.EnterpriseDB.com



--
Rushabh Lathia

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Rushabh Lathia"
Date:
Subject: Problem with Bitmap Heap Scan
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Rethink the way FSM truncation works.