Re: SCSI vs SATA - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: SCSI vs SATA
Date
Msg-id 4613C954.8050203@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SCSI vs SATA  (Andreas Kostyrka <andreas@kostyrka.org>)
Responses Re: SCSI vs SATA
List pgsql-performance
> difference. OTOH, the SCSI discs were way less reliable than the SATA
> discs, that might have been bad luck.

Probably bad luck. I find that SCSI is very reliable, but I don't find
it any more reliable than SATA. That is assuming correct ventilation etc...

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake


>
> Andreas
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
>        choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
>        match
>


--

       === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
              http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Andreas Kostyrka
Date:
Subject: Re: SCSI vs SATA
Next
From: david@lang.hm
Date:
Subject: Re: SCSI vs SATA