Tom Lane wrote:
> Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek.Kotala@Sun.COM> writes:
>> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Indeed, but that would be far more effectively addressed by fixing the
> *other* code path that doesn't segment at all (the
> LET_OS_MANAGE_FILESIZE option, which is most likely broken these days
> for lack of testing). I don't see the point of a halfway measure like
> increasing RELSEG_SIZE.
LET_OS_MANAGE_FILESIZE is good way. I think one problem of this option I
fixed. It is size of offset. I went thru the code and did not see any
other problem there. However, how you mentioned it need more testing. I
going to take server with large disk array and I will test it.
I would like to add --enable-largefile switch to configure file to
enable access to wide group of users. What you think about it?
Zdenek
