Gregory Stark wrote:
> "Neil Conway" <neilc@samurai.com> writes:
>
>> On Wed, 2007-16-05 at 15:10 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> I beg to differ.
>> On what grounds?
>
> "which see" is an unusual formulation but it's actually pretty standard. You
> see it a lot in older texts. IIRC it's used heavily in the TeX book.
>
> It's probably not a bad idea to avoid it though given that many readers will
> indeed be surprised by it.
yes indeed - looks pretty weird to me at least (as a non native speaker)
Stefan
