Re: Performance query about large tables, lots of concurrent access - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: Performance query about large tables, lots of concurrent access
Date
Msg-id 46796E95.30503@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Performance query about large tables, lots of concurrent access  (Michael Stone <mstone+postgres@mathom.us>)
Responses Re: Performance query about large tables, lots of concurrent access
List pgsql-performance
Michael Stone wrote:
> Is there a sensible way to partition the large table into smaller tables?

It entirely depends on your data set.

Joshua D. Drake


>
> Mike Stone
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
>       subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
>       message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>


--

       === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
              http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Kurt Overberg
Date:
Subject: Re: Maintenance question / DB size anomaly...
Next
From: Andrew Sullivan
Date:
Subject: Re: Performance query about large tables, lots of concurrent access