Re: Problem with recent PostgreSQL relatedpressrelease - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: Problem with recent PostgreSQL relatedpressrelease
Date
Msg-id 4697E98A.7070601@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Problem with recent PostgreSQL relatedpressrelease  (Jim Nasby <decibel@decibel.org>)
List pgsql-advocacy
Jim Nasby wrote:
> On Jul 13, 2007, at 3:24 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> Jonah H. Harris wrote:
>>> On 7/13/07, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote:
>>>> That kind of makes my point :)
>>> The fact is, if you write a PostgreSQL-only app, it will run perfectly
>>> on PostgreSQL or EnterpriseDB.
>>
>> But that isn't what I asked. I asked if I wrote an EnterpriseDB app
>> would it run on PostgreSQL, the answer is clearly no. Yes, yes we can
>> of course not use Enterprise (Oracle) features, but one of the
>> benefits of EnterpriseDB is that I "can" use those Oracle features.
>>
>> That is my only point.
>
> And if someone buys Mammoth and sets up replication, they're just as
> locked-in.

Nope.

Joshua D. Drake




--

       === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
              http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/


pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Jim Nasby
Date:
Subject: Re: Problem with recent PostgreSQL relatedpressrelease
Next
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: Problem with recent PostgreSQL relatedpressrelease