Re: Vacuum full considered useful ;) - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Guillaume Lelarge
Subject Re: Vacuum full considered useful ;)
Date
Msg-id 4698FB0A.4070502@lelarge.info
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Vacuum full considered useful ;)  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-performance
Joshua D. Drake a écrit :
>
>>    No wonder, I got IO problems with such a fragmentation.
>>
>>    For people not very familiar with postgres especially those coming
>> from mysql,
>>    i'd recommend paying attention to this.
>
> Definitely. The problem here is that you just aren't vacuuming enough,
> not that you didn't vacuum full. I would suggest reviewing autovacuum
> and seeing if that will help you.
>

And paying attention to the max_fsm_pages setting. A value too low won't
help vacuum's work.

Regards.


--
Guillaume.
http://www.postgresqlfr.org
http://docs.postgresqlfr.org

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Vacuum full considered useful ;)
Next
From: Vivek Khera
Date:
Subject: Re: Vacuum full considered useful ;)