Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Dave Page
Subject Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)
Date
Msg-id 46DB1B32.9010806@postgresql.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)
List pgsql-advocacy
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Andy Astor wrote:
>> Commercial Benefit
>> ------------------
>> EnterpriseDB will receive zero commercial benefit from the name change.
>
> All due respect Andy but that is simply not true. You have EnterpriseDB
> Postgres, there is name correlation. That is business value. You know
> better.

If that was the aim we would have branded it as "EnterpriseDB
PostgreSQL" from the outset. At the time that was decided this
reincarnation of the topic was far in the future so there was no reason
for us to suspect a possible name change.

/D




pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Chris Mair
Date:
Subject: Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)
Next
From: Dave Page
Date:
Subject: Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)