-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 09/14/07 04:06, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
> Where does PostgreSQL stand with storing /really/ large amounts of data
> offline? Specifically, if a FUSE is used to move a tablespace to
> something like a tape archiver can the planner be warned that access
> might take an extended period?
>
> I know that at one point (v6?) there were hooks in the code for
> experimental Berkeley code to do this sort of thing but as far as I know
> there has never been anything publicly available.
While tertiary media certainly was relevant 10 years ago, is it
really necessary in 2007? A couple of MSA-1000s stuffed with 1TB
disks would hold an l-o-t *lot* of historical data.
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day.
Hit him with a fish, and he goes away for good!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFG6rpUS9HxQb37XmcRApN4AJ9ETn8nRlfGn67oRk4KVvd2+S6vtQCeKzlh
pxIham1MIue8+PhxuK0PBFQ=
=nOC4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
