Andy Astor wrote:
> With respect, Ron, the majority of people in the original conversation
> were clearly in favor of a change, as Bruce has said. In this more
> recent thread, the most vocal opponents have made their opinions clear,
> but most of the original participants have not. This does not appear to
> me to be a “naming coup.” Just a reasoned response to the many opinions
> voiced over a reasonable period of time.
The crux of this (and its the case with most other OSS projects without
a dedicated voting system) is that the "votes" are scattered throught
various threads. There is not a proper place where people can cast (and
update) their vote. As such anyone majority is just a snapshot of who
cares to comment on this thread (again and again since both sides have
people unwilling to give in).
regards,
Lukas
