Alexander Kirpa wrote:
> On 18 Oct 2007, at 12:04, Dave Page wrote:
>
>> Alexander Kirpa wrote:
>> In addition some suggestion about 'Types', especially 'System type'.
>>> Possible exist reason for 'System type' need have separate place in
>>> tree. In my case more 100 'System type' etc. plus only approx. 10
>>> real 'Types' that too hide within 'System Types'
>> System types live under the Catalogs node. What you are probably
>> seeing is types created by contrib modules in the public schema.
> Please try on empty DB with 'Show System Objects in the treeview':
> CREATE TABLE i2(i2 smallint NOT NULL,CONSTRAINT i2_pk PRIMARY KEY
> (i2));
>
> and see "system" type 'i2' in 'Types'
>
> In case 100-200 tables DB with 5-10 "user" 'Types' - "system" 'Types'
> only waste space and hide important "user" types plus hints for
> "system" type wrong:
> 1. Impossible DROP and/or MODIFY 'System Types'
> 2. Impossible change owner of 'System Type' over 'Properties'
>
> Possible solution:
> a) Separate branch under 'Schemas'->(public)->'System Types'/'Table
> Types' or
> b) Separate branch under appropriate table 'Schemas'->(public)-
>> 'Tables'->(i2)->'Types'
They aren't systems types - as you note they're table types. They're
shown (like, for example, the sequences created for serial columns),
because there may be legitimate uses for them, such as creating
functions that return them.
Regards, Dave
