Re: BUG #14820: Standby crash with "could not access status oftransaction" (for track_commit_timestamp) - Mailing list pgsql-bugs
From | Jeremy Schneider |
---|---|
Subject | Re: BUG #14820: Standby crash with "could not access status oftransaction" (for track_commit_timestamp) |
Date | |
Msg-id | 4744cb5b-8962-8f10-f729-7cfeba807fcb@amazon.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | [BUGS] BUG #14820: Standby crash with "could not access status oftransaction" (for track_commit_timestamp) (matioli.matheus@gmail.com) |
Responses |
Re: BUG #14820: Standby crash with "could not access status oftransaction" (for track_commit_timestamp)
|
List | pgsql-bugs |
On 9/20/17 02:26, matioli.matheus@gmail.com wrote:
The following bug has been logged on the website: Bug reference: 14820 ... 2017-09-20 03:46:36.598 -03 [50892]: [3-1] LOG: entering standby mode 2017-09-20 03:46:36.607 -03 [50892]: [4-1] LOG: redo starts at 23AF/47E40620 2017-09-20 03:46:36.621 -03 [50892]: [5-1] FATAL: could not access status of transaction 1556437428 2017-09-20 03:46:36.621 -03 [50892]: [6-1] DETAIL: Could not read from file "pg_commit_ts/E7FB" at offset 229376: Success. 2017-09-20 03:46:36.621 -03 [50892]: [7-1] CONTEXT: xlog redo at 23AF/481CE818 for Transaction/COMMIT: 2017-09-20 03:17:18.239579-03 2017-09-20 03:46:36.623 -03 [50889]: [3-1] LOG: startup process (PID 50892) exited with exit code 1 2017-09-20 03:46:36.623 -03 [50889]: [4-1] LOG: terminating any other active server processes 2017-09-20 03:46:36.721 -03 [50889]: [5-1] LOG: database system is shut down Now any attempt to start any of the standby servers gives the above errors (the transaction and offset are exact the same). Do you think it may be a bug? Notice that I loaded `pglogical`, which I don't think is the one causing trouble, but it may be an important information. It seems to be something related to `track_commit_timestamp` or using `wal_level='logical'`, but I'm not sure how to debug it. I have checked and the file `pg_commit_ts/E7FB` is on the data directory with 229376, so looks like it is trying to read the file past its end, hence the above error.
I recently saw a problem that looked very similar to this, seems worth reporting on the same thread.
PostgreSQL version: 10.3
Operating system: Linux
On startup, while attempting recovery, PostgreSQL failed to startup with the following error:
FATAL: could not access status of transaction 68544569
DETAIL: Could not read from file "pg_commit_ts/0A37" at offset 106496: Success.
CONTEXT: WAL redo at 70E/E5FE2030 for Transaction/COMMIT: 2018-xx-xx xx:xx:xx.xxxxxx-xx; subxacts: 68544570
LOG: startup process (PID 100292) exited with exit code 1
LOG: aborting startup due to startup process failure
LOG: database system is shut down
This is on a primary, not a standby. track_commit_timestamp is on, wal_level is replica and there are no shared_preload_libraries.
The pg_commit_ts directory was actually empty when recovery started and in the process of recovery PostgreSQL recreated the 0A37 file. However it consistently created a 106496 byte file (entirely filled with 0/nulls) and then threw the error above when trying to read beyond the end. If we removed the 0A37 file and restarted then it would again recreate the 106496 byte file and error out in the same way.
Here's the WAL it was trying to apply at failure, with preceding and following entries:
rmgr: Heap len (rec/tot): 71/ 71, tx: 68544569, lsn: 70E/E5FE1FD0, prev 70E/E5FE1F98, desc: HOT_UPDATE off 2 xmax 68544569 ; new off 10 xmax 0, blkref #0: rel 1663/3850018/16485 blk 295474
rmgr: Transaction len (rec/tot): 46/ 46, tx: 68544569, lsn: 70E/E5FE2030, prev 70E/E5FE1FD0, desc: COMMIT 2018-xx-xx xx:xx:xx.xxxxxx UTC; subxacts: 68544570
rmgr: Heap len (rec/tot): 54/ 54, tx: 68539960, lsn: 70E/E5FE2060, prev 70E/E5FE2030, desc: LOCK off 12: xid 68539960: flags 0 LOCK_ONLY EXCL_LOCK , blkref #0: rel 1663/11038913/16866 blk 6135
Unfortunately the WAL files from the time of the issue are no longer available, so I'm unable to go back and do any additional analysis of the original crash. (Like looking more at those transactions.) But I wanted to at least get a record over here of what happened.
-Jeremy
-- Jeremy Schneider Database Engineer Amazon Web Services
pgsql-bugs by date: