Re: Stupid question about WAL archiving - Mailing list pgsql-general

From David Wall
Subject Re: Stupid question about WAL archiving
Date
Msg-id 47913398.6010403@computer.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Stupid question about WAL archiving  (Erik Jones <erik@myemma.com>)
List pgsql-general
> Which is exactly why I pointed out that using pg_standby's -k switch
> was the more reliable option.

And supposedly even that switch is not needed once we can get to 8.3,
which should be soon.  Even the -k switch can be an issue since you
don't really know how many you should keep around.

David

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Erik Jones
Date:
Subject: Re: WARNINGs after starting backup server created with PITR
Next
From: Hannes Dorbath
Date:
Subject: Re: PHP and Postgres arrays