Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> What's the reason for this? :-)
>>
>> Keeping it on the main website gets you the global distribution for
>> faster access, and also better caching for people... Is there any reason
>> not to use that?
>
> Yes -- one of the .css files references another one by relative path, so
> it gets a 404 when loaded from archives.
Hmm. Yuck. That does make sense though :-)
> I guess another solution would be to fix all the relative paths in
> there.
Probably not a bad idea, to at least retain the ability. Care to submit
a patch? ;)
//Magnus
